POWERFUL
VIDEOCONFERENCING
The report below
reflects on the 2007 Socrates-Arion conference held in Birmingham, UK titled
Powerful Videoconferencing. The report consists of 6 parts pertaining
to the following areas:
1)
background and initial expectations of the
participants and organisers
2)
questions and problems resulting from meetings
and sessions
3)
developed ideas and devised solutions
4)
possible follow-up activities and projects
5)
dissemination of conference outcomes
6)
aspects to be looked into in the future (not
concluded on during the conference)
The report ends with general conclusions and suggestions for
educational institutions.
PART I
Initially all the delegates presented briefly their
educational environment and problems they would like to investigate. The
presentations set the background for meetings and discussions to follow and
helped the organisers to focus on particular topics pertaining to education,
tutoring, supervision and technology used for educational purposes.
The delegates represented all types of educational
institutionts ranging from the ministry of education (Turkey) through
supervising and training institutions (Spain and Turkey) to secondary
schools (Italy, Turkey, Spain and Poland).
The delagates were particulary interested in the following
issues:
q
how videoconferencing can be
applied for everyday teaching /with a special emphasis on SEN and gifted
students/ and to teacher training
q
what educational problems
could be solved thanks to videoconferencing,
q
which software and hardware
is reliable, safe and school-friendly,
q
what technical requirements
must be met to guarantee smooth voice and video transfer,
q
what are the possible
technical and organisational problems connected with videoconferencing
q
what are the theoretical and
philosophical foundations (if any available at present) behind
videoconferencing for education.
The delegates were also interested what projects could be
carried out in the future between the delegates’ schools (Spanish, Turkish,
Polish, English and Italian); they were also eager to discover how similar
Spanish, Turkish, Polish, English and Italian educational systems are in
terms of dealing with behavioural problems, organisation of teaching,
training in-service teachers (especially vocational subjects - Spain),
planning educational policy and using advanced IT technology for educational
needs.
The organisers were the representatives of the Athena project
– a British initiative aiming at improving the quality and efficiency of
education in secondary and primary schools.
The theme of
the conference derived basicly from videoconferencing to be understood as a
tool to support education, target-applied to overvcome universal educational
problems present in selected (Spanish, Turkish, Polish, English and Italian)
schools, that is to say to: attainment, achievement and attendance. The
organisers have been using videocinferencing for 7 years to support teachers
and headteachers in one secondary and 6 primary schools in the Birmingham
educational zone. For Athena project videoconferencing has been used to
provide supportive lessons in literacy and numeracy, complementary classes
in advanced maths for gifted students and cross-curricular lessons for
general development (e.g. nomads). Through videoconferencing the organisers
managed to link schools with other institutions (e.g. Cambridge University,
Texas University, museums) and to provide technical support (Polycom) or
link schools together (example of this on tuesday, 22 May between four
primary schools in Harbourne Hill, Birmingham , UK). The conference leading
theme did not yet narrow down talks and questions to videoconferencing
exclusively; other, general education problems were discussed, especially in
a comparative perspective (e.g. age of compulsory education, standards of
education, secondary school final examinations, graduation requirements,
vocational training)
PART
II
During the
following three days of the conference (22-25 May) the delegates took part
in sessions, listened to lectures, watched presentations, observed lessons,
met educational authorities, headteachers and teachers and discussed a
number of problems related to videoconferencing, organisation of schoollife
and prospective educationnal projects to be carried out after the
conference. The organisers provided comprehensive context for the meetings
and visits (sessions in different classrooms and schools, schools with
different level of attainment, students with different social, cultural and
native-language background) and created the atmosphere and setting for
creative cooperation between the delegates themselves as well as between the
delegates and the organisers (sessions in ICT labs, on-line
videoconferences, group and team work, individual one-to-one discussions,
cultural support – cuisine, fine arts, music).
All the above
meetings, sessions and activities resulted in a number of questions, that
is:
q
can the organisation of the
delegates schools promote videoconferencing?
q
is it necessary to employ
specially trained teachers?
q
does VC teaching demand
special skills? What are they and where teachers can train?
q
how can technical problems
be solved (transfer speed, quality of voice and video)?
q
Is VC safe in terms of the
Internet abuse?
q
is it possible to run
regular lessons with British schools for foreign language classes?
q
how can teachers and
students deal with stress during VC?
q
is it possible to support
Polish, Italian, Spanish and Turkish students learning in British schools
under longterm projects?
q
are there less expensive VC
solutions that those presented by the organisers?
q
are British
teachers/students/authorities likely to cooperate with other European
schools (Italian, Spanish, Turkish and Polish)?
q
how to prepare teaching
materials for VC?
q
if VC teaching is to be used
as remedial teaching what diagnostic tools can be used to assess the initial
situation and how evaluate outcomes?
PART III
Working cooperatively, the conference
participants agreed that VC teaching is a universal, and truly a powerfool
tool to be used for educational purposes; its potential should be used and
developed to raise studuents’ attainment and boost teachers’ competence and
teaching skills. The experience and know-how of the Athena authors can and
should be spread and used across European schools. The participants agreed
that the following steps should be taken to implement VC in schools to deal
with universal, crosseuropean educational issues: These are devided into two
groups:
Technology
-
cheaper solutions should be used at the
beginning (e.g. Polycom PVX)
-
only secured and encoded channels are to be
used for educational needs for safety reasons, not public open applications
(eg. MSN or Skype),
-
schools and institutions schould look for
technical support in the regional representatives and try to use various
systems,
-
alternative lesson should always be at hand
should the VC session be interrupted,
-
the Interent Help Forum should be
created to discuss technical aspects of VC for education,
-
VC hardware and software solutions should
eneble links between various Internet networks.
Organisation
-
organisation of the participating schools and
institutions enables VC cooperation between teachers
-
educational policy of the participating
countries enables using VC in schools
-
cooperation should start with identifying
potentials and problems to overcome,
-
VC cooperation should follow the folowing
order: individual teachers e-mail contacts, teacher preparatory VC sessions,
preparing a sample VC lesson materials (working sheets, internet resources,
photographs) on a selected topic, consulting the materials with experts/the
organisers, running the lesson and evaluation,
-
local educational institutions should be
informed about the potential and benefits of using VC (sessions, internet
site, talks to the local authorities and headteachers in Intaly, Poland,
Spain and Turkey)
-
school curricula schould be altered to eneble
an intercalss videoconference once a month
PART
IV
Cooperation
(possible
projects to follow)
-
create a database with universal VC lesson
scenarios to hels SEN students (available through a web site), refer to
Athena web site,
-
support British schools with newly arrived
Polish, Spanish, Turkish and Italian students (using VC),
-
provide support for British schools for FL
learning (eg. Spanish),
-
carry out theme projects in various subjects
(e.g. maths, science, environemnt, health technology, history) between
schools to help specially gifted studnets,
-
carry out linguistic projects to promote
mobility and teacher in-service training (eg. basic courses in
Polish/Turkish, Italian/Turkish and vocational training)
PART V
The
participants agreed that local educational authorities should be
informed about the potential of using VC. It was also agreed that the best
solution would be to start using VC projects in smaller projects,
e.g. through Socrates LLP projects or e-Twinning mini projects rather that
on national or regional scale. During the conference the participants
created a database of contacts for schools willing to partake in LLP
projects using VC. It was also agreed that meetings with teachers
shoulds be held in the participating schools to promote the idea of
videoconferencing.
PART VI
The participants
agreed that still, there is a number of questions to be answered as far as
VC for education is concerned. The most important of them are:
-
should students cognitive and learning styles
be analised prior to implementing VC in teaching?
-
how should evaluation tools be standarised to
assess the efficiency of using VC in teaching.
-
should VC be more a remedial or a supportive
tool?
FINAL
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
Video
conferences open new possibilities for education and can be used both as a
teaching and remedial tool. Videoconferencing is a culture and language
independent aid to be used in schools across Europe on all levels of
education – primary, secondary and tertiary. Videoconferencing helps to
extend educational context (links with art galleries, universities, distant
countries - Africa). Video conferences and new technologies are challenge
for teachers and educators and must not be treated superficially and without
adequate knowledge.
Implementing
new technologies (interactive boards, digital video cameras, supervised
databases) is a must for modern education to support mobility, quality of
education and intercultural dialogue in migrating Europe. More sessions,
conferences and meetings must be organised to direct European education
towards new communication channels and media.